![]() Like other major transitions, change is often resisted because of the perceived risks involved However, he said, current practices also present risks. There is still a big hill to climb when considering alternative energy sources for space travel, Pares said. VEM Drive could take us to Mars in 18 days. Currently, it takes 10.5 months to get to Mars. “However, it takes efficient means to get from point A to point B. “The potential economic benefits for a space nation are staggering,” Pares said. Also, applying Einstein’s theory, time and space could move faster outside the spacecraft than inside if it were enclosed in a warp bubble. Practical experience is likely to demonstrate that the theory is applicable. With limited natural resources and the vast quantities needed to generate the right amount of fuel needed to launch rockets into space, Pares and Finley say scientists have begun to invest in experiments. Similarly, late last year, a scientist with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) stumbled across a tiny, but measurable, warp bubble. yes, albeit on a small scale, with this they call VEM (Electromagnetic Inverter). While warp and warp speed controls are mostly theoretical and described in Star Trek and Star Wars stories, Pares and Finley conducted research showing that the concept is measurable. ![]() “By compressing the space fabric in front of the craft, you create a vertical bubble around the craft and behind the bubble, which expands allowing the bubble to move through the air,” says Pares. Read The Space Foundation Discovery Center in Colorado Springs turns ten in the terrestrial and space environments.” “If we could induce artificially generated electromagnetic fields to overlap at certain angles to cause this compression, an aircraft using this energy could be propelled upward. “According to Einstein’s theory of general relativity, matter and energy can warp spacetime,” Pares said. before the object “disappears” and more space appears behind the object. This concept, known as a “warp bubble,” assumes that, like a treadmill, physics moves stationary objects forward by sending them along a path that space in front of. Just as the world is rethinking energy use due to cost, as well as environmental impact, Pares and Finley explore options that until recently were considered science fiction. “Almost 90% of the rocket’s weight is propellant – the rest is payload.” “The current approach is used for space shuttles, space telescopes, the International Space Station, satellites and chemical propellant launches,” said Pares. United Nations faculty members Dave Pares, from the Department of Geography and Geology, and Kyle Finley, from the Interdisciplinary School of Computing, believe that the costs – in terms of materials and personnel – can be largely avoided by thinking rethink our approach to space travel by moving away from fuel. Risk management has become a big deal for NASA after incidents like Columbia, Challenger, and Apollo.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |