![]() He found a world greatly afraid of machines, but managed to blend in without suspicion. Īs Machine Man, X-51 assumed the name Aaron Stack and became a fugitive in the eyes of the military. X-51 vowed that Stack's dream of human and robot peace would come true. Stack managed to remove the self-destruct mechanism from X-51, but figured he couldn't dispose of the bomb before it exploded, and urged Aaron to leave him. Each of the robots was equipped with an auto-destruct device that could be triggered remotely. The project was determined a failure and the order came down to destroy them. The other 50 models began displaying psychotic tendencies due to insufficient programming. Abel Stack took X-51, one of the the projects robots, home to test his radical theory-that a robot could only function like a human if it was raised like one. Their goal was to create a sophisticated weapons system capable of independent thought. military project worked on creating an army of 51 experimental robotic soldiers capable of acting like humans. It does not store any personal data.Scientists working for a top-secret U.S. The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. ![]() The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". ![]() The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. Such a “deep” philosophical insight to a MODEL!!! PLEASE! Keep posting your “intelligent” discussions so that we may all be enlightened by your “superior” intellect! Oh my, I think I need a trip to the toilet… to review your monumental…thoughts! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! “Pompous Ass” doesn’t even begin to cover it! I don’t think I have EVER seen such pretentious, idiodic, assinine foolishness as this twerp puts out! At least I have been able to get a few days laughs out of it. Princess TANK: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA YOu won’t understand it then, either…so don’t read it wittgenstein it’d be a waste. Start with the tractatus… someone as stupid as you won’t understand it. You’ve never Read Russell or Wittgenstein (I can say this with complete confidence), so you don’t understand what they wrote and where they disagree (or that I disagree with both on many important points). The rest of your idiotic ramblings don’t make any sense. If it’s meaningless, then it nonetheless CANNOT make sense. No sentence that is logical can, at the same time be meaningless. A grammatically structured sentence can be meaningless. Natural language is not an artificial language like a logic and thus does not need to be logical at all. LOL! It would be that people like you were disagreeing with what I wrote, and with words like “no” and “double negation”.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |